Ghost Cities
As a reader, this is my kind of novel. Multilayered, comical, clever in plot and wordplay. It has also achieved great success – winning the prestigious Miles Franklin Award and shortlisted for almost every other Australian literary awards. But famously it took ten years to publish, as Siang Lu exhausted every literary agents in Australia and the U.S. before University of Queensland Press finally published it as Lu’s second novel. I’d like to think that there are lessons to learn for all those agents and publisher who turned down the manuscript. And for writers, to appreciate that perseverance and undaunted self-belief is a job requirement for anyone with an original, quality manuscript in their hands.
The novel
opens in Imperial China with the coronation of Emperor Lu Huang Du. The Emperor
has great power, exercised in both ruthless and ludicrous ways: ‘His first act
as Emperor was to order the execution of all who repeated the rumours [of
patricide and regicide]. His second act was to order the deaths of the chickens
– all of them’ (p. 3). A series of advisers are thrown into the ‘Six Levels of
Hell’ (Imperial Prison) and we are introduced to absurd proclamations to the ‘Dear
citizens of the Imperial City’ (p. 5). A macabre testing of taste-testers
follows, with only one survivor from the ‘Poisoned Banquet’ – a beggar who
gains the royal title, ‘Taster to the Taster’.
That’s just
the opening chapter, and it’s only 5 pages in length.
Chapter 2
shifts the narrative to an Australian character in George Street Sydney, in contemporary
times. Xiang Lu is reluctantly visiting Doctor Mok (‘Is there another doctor
available? I saw Doctor Collision last time’ [p. 9]) Xiang admits that his
ancestors are Chinese, and he is diagnosed with a condition called ‘Taikophobia’:
fear of Chinese people (p. 11). It’s not a good day for Xiang, who is dismissed
from his job as a translator for the Chinese Consulate after they realise that
his Chinese language is poor and he has been using Google Translate. He is ‘a
bad Chinese person’, and the hashtag ‘Bad Chinese’ is born.
That’s
chapter 2, also 5 pages in length.
Obviously,
I am not going to continue to describe each chapter but the summaries indicate
the narrative structure with its dual setting, shift between the past and
present-- side-by-side narratives unified by a comic tone and a sense of the absurd. Xiang is a likeable
character, open-hearted, soon falling in love with a real translator named Yuan;
he is out of his depth with her intelligence and beauty, but redeemed through
humour, like a character from a romantic comedy.
About a
hundred pages into the novel, the second narrative (Xiang’s) takes us away from
the Sydney setting to one of China’s ghost cities, Port Man Tou. A powerful
Chinese film director Baby Bao has opened part of the city to act as a film set, with thousands of people employed as actors to live out seemingly
normal lives under the gaze of ever-present cameras. And #BadChinese is to be
part of the promotional material and publicity machinery. In the meantime, the ‘historical’
narrative takes the reader into an equally Borgesian world of labyrinths and shadow
historians. One of the many quirky tales involves the Emperor creating dozens
of doubles, only to be enraged when a ‘golden-robed doppelganger’ takes over
the Imperial Palace, as the Trickster strides the grounds ‘with impunity’
(p.202).
The back
cover compares the allegorical and imaginative novel to Haruki Murakami and
Italo Calvino, and this seems like a good field. But I like the Australian-Chinese
nature of the novel in its dual settings, its comedy and outlook. Xiang proves
his worth to Yuan by refusing his role in a Chinese dating show, ‘live in China
and [broadcast] on delay in Australia’ (p. 274). The outcome described in the
vernacular: ‘Shit. This is not going at all like I imagined’ (p. 276).
Xiang has
become a celebrity but escapes his #BadChinese brand by (ironically) learning
some Chinese. As for the city, it too evolves in a manner that might be read as
emblematic of culture beyond the Anglo-European western metropole (whether that be in China or
Australia):
We watch as
the city reconstructs itself from its own materials … On certain days it comes
to resemble other cities, all cities … the 7th arrondissement in
Pari. Times Square in New York. The skyline of Nihonbashi Kabutochõ.
Of late, its
imposing structures have come to resemble nothing we know. Restlessly, it
replaces itself with new and stranger iterations. The city has no referents
now. Only itself. (p. 290).
That sounds
like a post-colonial dream of authenticity. Imagine that Sydney, Melbourne or Perth –
and not just the ghost city of Port Man Tou – woke up to itself.

Comments
Post a Comment