The Prague Orgy
When I first visited Prague in November 1995, the ghostly presence of
the Cold War seemed to linger in the wintry setting, the quiet
streets after dark, and the strange shuffling, secretive habits of the owner of
the apartment I was renting. And yet it was also very much apart from a decade
earlier, when Philip Roth published The
Prague Orgy (1985) and the Cold War was in the middle of a charged resurgence. I recently re-read this book and felt not nostalgia but horror.
Imagine an era of secret police, disappearances, authoritarian power and
personal fear. Yes, it hasn’t entirely gone away from the world at large
(Russia, China, Iran) – even if Wenceslas Square is now a place of tourism and
high street shopping.
In this novella, Roth continues with the character of Nathan
Zuckerman, a successful America novelist and protagonist of three earlier works
of fiction (The Ghost Writer [1979], Zuckerman Unbound [1981], The Anatomy Lesson [1984]). The setting
is 1976. Zuckerman agrees to go to Prague to retrieve the unknown books of a
“great Jewish writer that might have been” (p.26) – on behalf of the mysterious author's exiled
son, Zdenek Sisovsky. There he will meet Sisovky’s wife, Olga, also a writer,
and a notorious character.
The second chapter opens at the house of Klenek, a film
director who gathers a bohemian crowd (whether he is present or not). “Come to
the orgy, Zuckerman – you will see the final stage of the revolution” (p.29).
This scene, and others like it in the short novel, is full of sharp, witty
dialogue – intentionally obscene, as if talk of sex is the only freedom left
(or a metaphor for some other form of exploitation and release). In any case,
Zuckerman fails to retrieve the manuscript and experiences temporary terror at
the hands of state police, followed by a bizarre conversation with the Minister
of Culture, and a rapid exit for “Zuckerman the Zionist agent” (p.88).
This short summary has been surprisingly hard to write.
Either I have left it a little too long after reading, or the novel itself is so
sharp as to render commentary supercilious. A paragraph from the penultimate
page might be better than attempting a final gloss. Novak is the Minister of
Culture mentioned above, and Zuckerman is reflecting on their unexpected
exchange before his release.
I also have to wonder if Novak’s narrative is any less an
invention than Sisovksy’s. The true Czech patriate to whom the land owes its
survival may well be another character out of mock-autobiography, yet another
fabricated father manufactured to serve the purposes of a storytelling son. As
if the core of existence isn’t fantastic enough, still more fabulation to
embellish the edges (p.88).
Even in the best of times, what can any writer do than
embellish the edges?
Comments
Post a Comment